Visitors Cannot Tell If A Tourist Attraction Is Bad For Animals

Visitors Cannot Tell If A Tourist Attraction Is Bad For Animals.

Tourism accounts for 9% of global GDP and comprises 1.1 billion tourist arrivals per annum. Visits to wildlife tourist attractions (WTAs) may account for 20–40% of global tourism, but no studies have audited the diversity of WTAs and their impacts on the conservation status and welfare of subject animals. World Animal Protected, together with the University of Oxford conducted a study and scored these impacts for 24 types of WTA, visited by 3.6–6 million tourists per year, and compared their scores to tourists’ feedback on TripAdvisor. Six WTA types (impacting 1,500–13,000 individual animals) had net positive conservation/welfare impacts, but 14 (120,000–340,000 individuals) had negative conservation impacts and 18 (230,000–550,000 individuals) had negative welfare impacts. Despite these figures only 7.8% of all tourist feedback on these WTAs was negative due to conservation/welfare concerns.The authors demonstrated that WTAs have substantial negative effects that are unrecognised by the majority of tourists, suggesting an urgent need for tourist education and regulation of WTAs worldwide. This article summarises the study’s conclusions.

Read Article Here: